Customer Stories
Real projects. Real terrain. Real results.
Higher capacity per hectare with E-W racks
East-West vs Single-Axis Tracker Density
A land-constrained 85 MWp site compared East-West dome racks against single-axis trackers. E-W configuration achieved 22% higher installed capacity per hectare with lower per-watt civil costs.
Read Case Study →Buildable area recovered via terracing
Terrace Grading on Steep Mediterranean Terrain
A 62 MWp hillside site with average slopes of 18% was initially deemed partially unbuildable. Terrace grading with adaptive row orientation recovered 38% of excluded area and kept cut/fill balanced on-site.
Read Case Study →Earthwork savings on a single project
Earthwork & Tracker Optimization
Three grading approaches compared on the same site with 44% hard rock terrain. Pile-adaptive grading with table splitting reduced earthwork volume by 70% and saved $727K versus conventional smoothing.
Read Case Study →Shading loss across spacing scenarios
Shading, Cable Length & DC Power Balance
Three row spacing scenarios on a north-facing slope quantified the trade-off between shading losses, DC cable costs, and installed capacity. The decision swings annual energy by 997 MWh and cable CAPEX by $105K per transformer area.
Read Case Study →Cable cost saved via topology comparison
Cable Routing Optimization
Three DC cabling topologies compared at 130 MWp scale. Leapfrog routing saved $430K versus Line String through 14% shorter cable runs and lower voltage drop.
Read Case Study →More energy from tracker configuration
Tracker vs Fixed-Tilt with BESS
A terrain-aware comparison of single-axis tracker vs. fixed-tilt configurations on a 125.2 MWp plant. Tracker produces 16.9% more energy but requires 77.5% more earthwork. BESS peak shaving analysis across 4 storage configurations.
Read Case Study →See these results on your project
Book a 30-minute demo with your terrain file. We'll run a live grading analysis and show you what terrain-aware design changes.